Guest Author: Sandra Byrd: Why I Love Writing About Ladies In Waiting

A rich alchemy of fact and fiction, the Ladies In Waiting series by Sandra Byrd  chronicles the glittering court lives of three Tudor Queens and the women chosen to be their closest friends and companions. The first book of the series, “To Die For: A Novel of Anne Boleyn”  was listed by Library Journal as one of the best books of 2011. “The Secret Keeper”, the second installment of the series and a novel of  Kateryn Parr, also received favorable reviews by the readers. Drawing on the  successes of first books of the Ladies In Waiting series, Sandra is now gearing up for her next installment, “Roses Have Thorns: A Novel of Elizabeth I”, which is due to release in 2013.

Author: Sandra Byrd

Having close friends is an important part of the female  experience from girlhood through womanhood. These friends might be especially valuable when the woman’s position is exalted, public, and potentially treacherous — such friendships take on an even more important role. When Oprah Winfrey started her empire she brought along Gayle King. When Kate Middleton was preparing to become Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge  her sister Pippa was her constant companion. And when Queens went to court, and stayed, they took their friends, too.

In Tudor England, Anne Boleyn asked her longtime friend Margaret Wyatt to stay with her throughout her ascent and then her queenship; Wyatt ultimately became her chief lady and Mistress of Robes and likely served Anne all the way to the scaffold.  Henry VIII told Queen Kateryn Parr that she should “choose whichever women she liked to pass the time with her in amusing manners or otherwise accompany her for her leisure,” and she did – mostly reformers like herself.  Queen Elizabeth I had ladies from all families and factions serve her, but she seemed to be closest to her Boleyn relatives, such as her cousin Katherine Carey Knollys, whom she could trust without question.  Queens often surrounded themselves with family members, hoping that they could trust in their loyalty because as the queen gained influence, so advanced her family.

Ladies-in-waiting were companions at church, at cards, at dance, and at hunt.  They tended to their mistress when she was  ill or anxious and also shared in her joy and pleasures.  They did not do menial tasks  — there were servants for that — but they did remain in charge of important elements of the Queen’s household, for example, her jewelry and her clothing.  As such, they were  intimate gatekeepers, there day and night.  They were privy to the queen when she had her makeup off and was in her dressing clothes and were high enough born to share some secrets with. Because of this, they knew the real woman.

In her excellent book, Ladies in Waiting, Anne Somerset quotes a lady-in-waiting to Queen Caroline as saying, “Courts are mysterious places … Intrigues, jealousies, heart-burnings, lies, dissimulation thrive in (courts)as mushrooms in a hot-bed.”  This is exactly the kind of place where one wants to know whom one can trust.  Somerset goes on to tell us that, “At a time when virtually every profession was an exclusively masculine preserve, the position of lady-in-waiting to the Queen was almost the only occupation that an upper class Englishwoman could with propriety pursue.”  Although direct control was out of their hands, the power of influence, of knowledge, of gossip, and of relationship networks  was within the firm grasp of these ladies. I like to write about women wielding whatever power they had, ascribed or taken, using their influence both overtly and subtly.  Ladies-in-waiting did just that.

Appointment was not only by the personal choice of the queen or the king, but a political decision as well.  Queen Victoria’s first stand took place when her new Prime Minister, Robert Peel, meant to replace some of the ladies in her household to reflect the bipartisan English government and keep an even political balance.  According to Maureen Waller in Sovereign Ladies,  Victoria was adamant. “‘I cannot give up any of my ladies,’ she told him at their second meeting.  ‘What, Ma’am!’ Peel queried, ‘Does your Majesty mean to retain them all?’ ‘All’, she replied.” When ladies-in-waiting turned and became disloyal, as did Sarah Churchill to Queen Anne, they were  very often severed from court.

Even today, the British Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II,  relies on ladies-in-waiting; two of them, Susan Hussey and Mary Morrison, have served her for more than fifty years apiece. Sally Bedell, in her book, Elizabeth the Queen: The Life of a Modern Monarch tells us that “… the queen from the outset has surrounded herself with an equally capable group of ladies-in-waiting, organized into a strict hierarchy, with medieval titles and clearly delineated tasks.” Further, “all the ladies in waiting are adept at circulating through receptions, running interference for their boss by engaging overeager guests in conversation, or arranging for introductions.”

When we twenty-first century women wonder who’s got our backs, the answer is very likely our friends, whom we trust implicitly and walk through life with.   Our friends wholly know us, strengths and blemishes alike.   When I write about a queen, I want to know the woman behind the gown and crown.  This is why I’ve loved writing about Ladies-in-Waiting.

Sandra Byrd is the author of more than three dozen books, including her series set in the Tudor Court, Ladies in Waiting.  You can walk through a Tudor Hall and then read more about these books at

Leave a Reply

Stay Connected